It is not easy to keep my journal updated after each lecture.
These weeks I have learnt the introduction to the seemingly "familiar" Christianity and the "unfamiliar" Islam. Frankly, because of the Catholic obligation, I am obligated to memorize the concepts of the Catholic dogmas, which almost covered Paul's lecture last week. Everything sounds familiar to me. But, I feel like I am always behaving like an "outsider" that I have the knowledge, but the religious knowledge is not internalized "in my thoughts, in my words, in what I have done (, and in what I have failed to do)". This is always a big challenge to me, I am wandering between the insider and outsider. I am not saying I am not faithful to my religion, but I am the Little Faith. I wish I won't be externalized...
Indeed there is not much to talk for the lecture on Christianity, so just move on to the Islam. I always believe Islam and Christianity are from the same origin. Yahweh is the only God for both religions, but due to the cultural difference, the religion was spread in dichotomous directions, and split into the two different religions.
Paul emphasized the core feature of Islam is its adoration to Arabic. Arabic is very important to the Muslim because it is the first language used prophet Muhammad communicated with Angel Gabriel, so the Arabic-written Qur'an, the Holy Book, is conceived as the most authentic scripture in Islam, which contains the word of God. I also agree that to interpret the religious meaning of the holy scriptures of any religions, the first language-written documentaries provide the highest degree of authenticity since the translators might have mistranslated the scriptures that would cause misinterpretation. However, if one doesn't have the holy sight / wisdom, even though he/she tries to read the most origin, it is still difficult for he/she to get the meaning. Yet, I don't think there is so-called "legitimate" meaning of the holy scriptures, everyone can have his/her own interpretation when reading them, they can find the most suitable and useful meaning.
Paul also attempted to explain the controversial question: is Islam a terrorist religion? This is an outsider's / bias perspective that always stereotype the religion, putting the emphasis on the "people" but not the "religion". Not only for Islam but other religions. I have heard a story, in brief is about a soap producer asks a father why the Church has already existed for two thousand years, people still commit to crimes, the world is still very chaotic and full of hatred. The father replies him with another question that why soap has already been found for so many centuries, people are still dirty and can't keep themselves dirt-free. The answer is, if people don't use the soap to cleanse their body always and prevent themselves to be smeared, the soap can hardly perform its function to keep people clean. Likewise, the religious dogmas are always there, but if people ignore it, or misuse it, the value of religion can hardly be manifested.
Haha, it seems a bit out of focus, but this is what I have reflected.